Fyorin  >  Resources >  Blog  >

Types of Liquidity Ratios: Key Metrics for Your Company’s Financial Health

Expense Management
Unified Treasury
Liquidity
By
Zuzanna Kruger
|
October 21, 2024
types of liquidity ratios

Liquidity ratios are financial metrics that show a company's ability to pay off its short-term debts. These ratios help investors, creditors, and analysts understand how well a business can meet its immediate financial obligations without raising outside capital. This article will explore the main types of liquidity ratios, their calculations, and their significance in financial analysis.

What Are Liquidity Ratios?

As per BIS, liquidity ratios are financial metrics that assess a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations using its most liquid assets. These ratios provide insights into a company’s financial health and operational efficiency, helping stakeholders evaluate its ability to cover its short-term debts with its readily available assets. By examining liquidity ratios, investors, creditors, and analysts can determine whether a company has enough liquid assets to pay off its short-term obligations without needing to secure additional funding. This makes liquidity ratios essential for evaluating a company’s short-term financial health and its ability to meet immediate obligations.

Current Ratio

The current ratio is the most basic and widely used liquidity ratio. It measures a company's ability to pay off its short-term liabilities (debts and payables due within one year) with its short-term assets (cash, inventory, and receivables).

Calculation:

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities

For example, if a company has $100,000 in current assets and $50,000 in current liabilities, its current ratio would be:

Current Ratio = $100,000 / $50,000 = 2

This means the company has $2 in current assets for every $1 of current liabilities.

Interpretation:

A current ratio of 2 or higher is often considered good, as it indicates the company can cover its short-term obligations twice over. However, the ideal ratio can vary by industry. A very high current ratio might suggest that a company is not using its assets efficiently.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Easy to calculate and understand
    Check Mark
    Provides a quick overview of a company's short-term financial health
    Check Mark
    Useful for comparing companies within the same industry

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    Does not consider the quality or liquidity of individual current assets
    Check Mark
    Can be manipulated by timing certain transactions at the end of a reporting period
    Check Mark
    May not accurately reflect a company's true liquidity if it has a large amount of inventory that is difficult to sell quickly

Quick Ratio

The quick ratio, also known as the acid-test ratio, is a more stringent measure of liquidity than the current ratio. It excludes inventory and prepaid expenses from current assets, focusing only on the most liquid assets.

Calculation:

Quick Ratio = (Cash + Marketable Securities + Accounts Receivable) / Current Liabilities

For instance, if a company has $30,000 in cash, $20,000 in marketable securities, $50,000 in accounts receivable, and $80,000 in current liabilities, its quick ratio would be:

Quick Ratio = ($30,000 + $20,000 + $50,000) / $80,000 = 1.25

Interpretation:

A quick ratio of 1 or higher is often considered good, as it indicates the company can cover its current liabilities with its most liquid assets. However, like the current ratio, the ideal quick ratio can vary by industry.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Provides a more conservative measure of liquidity than the current ratio
    Check Mark
    Focuses on assets that can be quickly converted to cash
    Check Mark
    Useful for companies with large inventories that may be difficult to liquidate

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    May understate a company's liquidity if it has a highly liquid inventory
    Check Mark
    Does not consider the timing of cash flows
    Check Mark
    Can be affected by the quality of accounts receivable

Cash Ratio

The cash ratio is the most conservative of the liquidity ratios. It only considers cash and cash equivalents in relation to current liabilities.

Calculation:

Cash Ratio = (Cash + Cash Equivalents) / Current Liabilities

If a company has $40,000 in cash and cash equivalents and $100,000 in current liabilities, its cash ratio would be:

Cash Ratio = $40,000 / $100,000 = 0.4

Interpretation:

A cash ratio of 1 means a company has exactly enough cash and cash equivalents to pay off its current liabilities. However, most companies maintain a cash ratio below 1, as it’s generally not efficient to hold large amounts of cash. A good liquidity ratio is typically considered to be 1.5 or higher, indicating that a company can adequately cover its short-term liabilities with its available short-term assets.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Provides the most conservative measure of liquidity
    Check Mark
    Useful in assessing a company’s ability to meet its obligations in a worst-case scenario
    Check Mark
    Not affected by the quality of inventory or accounts receivable

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    May understate a company’s true liquidity
    Check Mark
    Does not consider near-term cash inflows from operations or accounts receivable
    Check Mark
    A very high cash ratio might indicate inefficient use of resources

Operating Cash Flow Ratio

The operating cash flow ratio compares a company’s operating cash flow to its current liabilities. This ratio provides insight into a company’s ability to generate enough cash from operations to cover its short-term debts.

Calculation:

Operating Cash Flow Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Current Liabilities

If a company has an operating cash flow of $150,000 and current liabilities of $100,000, its operating cash flow ratio would be:

Operating Cash Flow Ratio = $150,000 / $100,000 = 1.5

Interpretation:

An operating cash flow ratio above 1 indicates that a company generated more cash from operations in a given period than it needs to pay off its current liabilities, which is generally considered a good sign of the company's financial health.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Focuses on cash generated from core business operations
    Check Mark
    Less susceptible to accounting manipulations than ratios based on balance sheet figures
    Check Mark
    Provides insight into a company’s ability to generate cash to cover short-term obligations

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    Can be volatile from period to period due to changes in working capital
    Check Mark
    Does not consider cash from investing or financing activities
    Check Mark
    May not be suitable for companies with seasonal or cyclical cash flows

Defensive Interval Ratio

The defensive interval ratio, also known as the basic defense interval ratio, measures how long a company can continue to pay for its operating expenses from its current liquid assets without relying on additional funding or income.

Calculation:

Defensive Interval Ratio = (Cash + Marketable Securities + Accounts Receivable) / Daily Operating Expenses

To calculate daily operating expenses, divide the total operating expenses for a year by 365.

For example, if a company has $100,000 in cash and cash equivalents, $50,000 in marketable securities, $150,000 in accounts receivable, and annual operating expenses of $730,000, its defensive interval ratio would be:

Daily Operating Expenses = $730,000 / 365 = $2,000

Defensive Interval Ratio = ($100,000 + $50,000 + $150,000) / $2,000 = 150 days

Interpretation:

This ratio indicates how many days a company can continue to operate using only its most liquid assets. In this example, the company could theoretically operate for 150 days without any additional income or funding. While the defensive interval ratio focuses on short-term liquidity, the solvency ratio provides insights into a company's long-term financial stability.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Provides a time-based measure of liquidity
    Check Mark
    Useful for assessing a company’s ability to weather short-term financial difficulties
    Check Mark
    Considers both liquid assets and daily cash burn rate

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    Assumes that daily expenses remain constant, which may not be realistic
    Check Mark
    Does not consider potential changes in accounts receivable collection or the ability to quickly sell marketable securities
    Check Mark
    May not be suitable for companies with highly variable operating expenses

Net Working Capital Ratio

The net working capital ratio, also known as the working capital ratio, measures the relationship between a company’s current assets and current liabilities.

Calculation:

Net Working Capital Ratio = (Current Assets - Current Liabilities) / Total Assets

If a company has $500,000 in current assets, $300,000 in current liabilities, and $1,000,000 in total assets, its net working capital ratio would be:

Net Working Capital Ratio = ($500,000 - $300,000) / $1,000,000 = 0.2 or 20%

Interpretation:

A positive net working capital ratio indicates that a company has more current assets than current liabilities, which is generally considered good. The higher the ratio, the more liquid the company is in the short term. While liquidity ratios like the net working capital ratio assess short-term financial health, solvency ratios provide a broader view of a company's ability to cover total financial obligations.

Advantages:

    Check Mark
    Provides a measure of a company’s short-term financial strength
    Check Mark
    Useful for comparing companies of different sizes within the same industry
    Check Mark
    Indicates the portion of a company’s assets tied up in working capital

Disadvantages:

    Check Mark
    Does not consider the quality or liquidity of current assets
    Check Mark
    May not be suitable for comparing companies across different industries
    Check Mark
    A very high ratio might indicate inefficient use of assets

Liquid Assets and Liquidity Ratios

Liquid assets are balance sheet accounts that can be easily converted to cash within a short period, typically within 90 days or less. These assets include cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivable. Liquidity ratios compare a company’s liquid assets to its current liabilities, providing a snapshot of its ability to repay new and existing short-term debt. The higher the liquidity ratio, the larger the margin of safety to cover short-term debts. This means that a company with a higher liquidity ratio is generally in a better position to meet its financial obligations promptly, ensuring smoother operational efficiency and financial stability.

Interpreting Liquidity Ratios

Interpreting liquidity ratios requires analysing the results in the context of the company’s industry, financial health, and operational efficiency. A higher liquidity ratio generally indicates a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations, while a lower ratio may signal potential liquidity problems. However, it’s essential to compare liquidity ratios to industry benchmarks, trends over time, and other financial metrics to get a comprehensive view of a company’s financial health. For instance, a higher liquidity ratio might be favourable in one industry but could indicate inefficiency in another. Therefore, understanding the specific context and industry standards is crucial for accurate interpretation.

Importance of Liquidity Ratios

Liquidity ratios measure a company’s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations, making them crucial tools for financial analysis. Here are some key reasons why liquidity ratios are important:

    Check Mark
    Assessing Short-Term Financial Health: Liquidity ratios help investors, creditors, and analysts determine if a company can meet its immediate financial obligations without external funding.
    Check Mark
    Comparing Companies: These ratios allow for easy comparison between companies in the same industry, helping investors make informed decisions about where to allocate their capital.
    Check Mark
    Identifying Potential Financial Troubles: Low liquidity ratios can be early warning signs of financial distress, allowing management and stakeholders to take corrective action before more serious problems arise.
    Check Mark
    Evaluating Management Efficiency: Liquidity ratios can indicate how efficiently a company manages its working capital and short-term assets.
    Check Mark
    Credit Analysis: Lenders use liquidity ratios to assess a company’s ability to repay short-term loans, which influences lending decisions and interest rates.
    Check Mark
    Regulatory Compliance: Some industries have regulatory requirements related to liquidity, making these ratios essential for compliance monitoring.
    Check Mark
    Strategic Planning: Management can use liquidity ratios to plan for future cash needs and make decisions about investments, dividends, and financing.

Real-World Applications and Examples

Liquidity ratios have many practical uses in real-world applications, such as evaluating a company’s creditworthiness for lending purposes, assessing its financial health and operational efficiency, and identifying potential liquidity problems and areas for improvement. These ratios are also valuable for comparing a company’s liquidity position to industry benchmarks and competitors, providing a clearer picture of its ability to meet short-term obligations and financial obligations.

For example, a company with a high liquidity ratio may be considered a safer investment, as it has a larger margin of safety to cover its short-term debts. On the other hand, a company with a low liquidity ratio may be seen as a riskier investment, as it may struggle to meet its short-term obligations. By understanding and interpreting liquidity ratios, stakeholders can evaluate a company’s financial health, operational efficiency, and ability to meet its financial obligations, making more informed decisions about investments, lending, and strategic planning.

Limitations of Liquidity Ratios

While liquidity ratios are valuable tools, they have limitations. These ratios typically represent a company's financial position at a specific point in time and may not reflect dynamic cash flows. They also vary significantly between industries, making cross-industry comparisons less meaningful. Additionally, different accounting methods can affect ratio values, leading to potential inconsistencies when comparing companies.

Liquidity ratios don't always reflect the quality or true liquidity of assets. For example, some inventory might be difficult to sell quickly at full value. Companies with seasonal business cycles may have liquidity ratios that fluctuate throughout the year, requiring consideration of measurement timing. These ratios usually don’t account for off-balance sheet items impacting a company's true liquidity position.

Lastly, liquidity ratios ignore the timing of cash inflows and outflows, crucial for effective liquidity management. Comparing ratios between companies of vastly different sizes may not yield meaningful insights. Users should be aware of these aspects when evaluating liquidity ratios.

Conclusion

Liquidity ratios are essential tools for assessing a company's short-term financial health. The current ratio, quick ratio, cash ratio, operating cash flow ratio, defensive interval ratio, and net working capital ratio each provide unique insights into a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations.

While these ratios are valuable for financial analysis, it's important to use them in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative factors to get a comprehensive view of a company's financial position. No single ratio can provide a complete picture of a company's liquidity, and the ideal values for these ratios can vary depending on the industry and specific circumstances of each company.

Investors, creditors, and analysts should use liquidity ratios as part of a broader toolkit for financial analysis, taking into account the limitations of these metrics and considering them alongside other financial indicators, industry trends, and company-specific factors. By doing so, they can gain a more nuanced and accurate understanding of a company's short-term financial health and its ability to weather potential financial challenges.

Share article
profile-image
Zuzanna Kruger
Growth Marketing Manager
linkedin
Zuzanna, Growth Marketing Manager at Fyorin, leverages her SXO and B2B expertise to uncover fintech trends and user insights. She translates these findings into practical strategies, helping businesses like yours optimise global financial operations and navigate the evolving financial landscape more effectively.

You might like...

Simplifying global expansion
Global Payments
Cross-border taxation issues
Global Expansion
Simplifying Global Expansion with Fyorin's Financial Services
By
James Camilleri
|
January 24, 2023
Cross-border payments | Fyorin
Global Payments
SMB
Multi-Banking
Reducing Costs in Cross-Border Payments
By
James Camilleri
|
November 1, 2021
The Future of Global Payments | Fyorin
Global Operations
CFO
Global Payments
The Future of International Payments: Modern Treasury for Global Payments
By
James Camilleri
|
July 6, 2022
Fyorin Logo
Automate cross border payments & transact globally like a local
Grow Globally with Fyorin